[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New here and first question about using repeat percent over more tha
From: |
Aurelien |
Subject: |
Re: New here and first question about using repeat percent over more than two measures |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:29:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:38:38AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote :
> Aurelien <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > \repeat percent X {
> > <first measure>
> > <seconde measure>
> > <third measure>
> > <fourth measure>
> > }
> >
> > but actually, it just prints empy measures in the end. Is there a way
> > to fix this, or am I trying to do something that doesn't exist, or
> > shouldn't, or whatever?
>
> What would you expect that to render as?
>
> Standard musical notation has repeat a note (thick slash), repeat one
> measure (dots around thick slash), and repeat two measures (dots around
> two thick slashes on the bar).
>
> There isn't AFAIK any standard musical notation for a more-than-two
> measure repeat. So that's why LilyPond doesn't produce anything: there
> isn't anything sensible to do by default.
OK, that was the point I was not sure on.
Actually, I remember having used some things like that, but it might be
that is was hand-written. If I remember well, the slashes were equal to
number of measures, and the "inner measures" were condensed at the
middle.
>
> This is usually done with volta repeats, and a text notation above
> saying how many times it should repeat. That doesn't help, of course, if
> you don't want the other staves in a system to repeat.
Actually, I would use that \repeat volta things, but it doesn't print
the number of repeats, so got to add a text notation. I felt this not to
be very clean, and thought there was another option (which I thought was
that repeat percent thing).
>
> So, while this may be a common requirement, it's apparently not common
> enough that musical notation has a standard answer.
OK. So repeat volta and text notation, no other way. It's a bit a shame,
cause actually lilypond already has the notion of "number of
repetitions" as you might write \repeat volta 3 {}, but it doesn't use
it automatically.
OK, got to dig a bit deeper on this.
Thanks a lot, by the way.
Cheers.
--
Aurélien