lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lilypond lobbying?


From: Jan-Peter Voigt
Subject: Re: Lilypond lobbying?
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:55:49 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11

Am 22.08.2011 13:07, schrieb Robert Schmaus:
Hi Lilyponderers,

I agree with Joseph - let's not blow this out of proportion and start
creating conspiracies. of course I also agree with everyone else that
this ist simply annoying and stupid, not to mention unprofessional, on
part of the contest organisers.

who, by the way, replied to my request why specifically they ask for
sibelius or finale. here's what they wote:
The winner composition will be played in concert
and edited. I hope you understand the implications of it.
This is a situation one can blame, but he will not change it by moarning and cheating. So again: if lilypond would be able to export musicXML one can say, hey why don't you take musicXML, Finale and Sibelius should be able to import this kind of file. The resulting file won't look as beautiful as the lilypond output, but should'nt it be possible just to write out all notes, clefs, time sigs and key sigs to a file, that might have music-xml-format? I did not have a deeper look into it (and don't remember, were its found), but I saw the export function in lily 2.15 wich generates textfiles with note-numbers and lengths. So it should be possible. I would'nt export the fine layout into other programs, because this will not work ever and would need very tricky two-pass execution. Does anyone know, what happens, if someone uses a sib-generated xml in finale?

Cheers, Jan-Peter




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]