Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?)

[PMA]

PMA wrote:
...
> Yes, I've sniffed & posted in IMSLP's site now -- enough to see
> that my "public-domain-like status" fears were misconceived,
> and to appreciate the gist of licenses being offered. I tend to
> expect that their 6th listed,
>
> Attribution + Non-commercial + No Derivatives
>
> would do me just fine (provided I can overcome the guilt from
> refusing to offer my works up as programmers' fodder :) ).

That last was pretty snotty!  So, appreciating the help that
several of you have extended, I feel obliged to add --

*If* I thought that my __newbie!__ .ly code were worthy of
being shown to others (as I apparently think its results are),
then I might reconsider *whether* to show it.  But there's
just no way I could think this.

Best regards,
Pete