[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:51:39 +0100 |
Hi David,
2012/2/19 David Nalesnik <address@hidden>:
> Hi Harm,
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>
>> 2) "correct" the syntax of the files you know have errors ready for that
>> move. Which you do is up to you - bear in mind that if you go for 2), then
>> it's possible that the work will be wasted if we struggle to get the LSR
>> updated. However, you will at least be prepared.
>>
>
> If you'd like to go the route of updating syntax in the problem files to
> 2.14, then I'll be happy to take on part of the task. Just let me know!
>
> -David
I fixed already following files:
Altering-the-number-of-stems-in-a-beam.ly
I changed the old override-auto-beam-setting.
automatic-beams-two-per-two-in-4-4-or-2-2-time-signature.ly
I changed the old override-auto-beam-setting.
coloring-individual-staff-lines.ly
I added the definition for interval-translate from 2.12.3
Better use an other fix?
how-to-define-autobeamsettings-in-the—layout-block.ly
I changed the autoBeamSettings.
Including-a-file-only-once.ly
I reimplemented the relevant definitions from "2.12.3"
Better use an other fix?
Obtaining-a-tablature-for-open-tuning-and-or-normal-tuning.ly
I replaced the number-lists with pitches-lists.
Better implementation with makeStringTuning?
TODO handle the log-warning: warning: no such internal option: open-tuning
TODO change the description
overriding-automatic-beam-settings.ly
I changed the old override-auto-beam-setting and a comment.
Positioning-tuplet-numbers-close-to-kneed-beams.ly
I changed 'thickness to 'beam-thickness as the author suggested (line 64).
specifying-context-with-beatgrouping.ly
I changed beatGrouping to beatStructure
Suggestion: New Title: doctitle = "Specifying context with beatStructure"
template-for-multiple-instruments,-prints-a-score-and-parts.ly
I changed the old override-auto-beam-setting.
use-custom-fonts-flat-b-and-sharp-#-symbols-for-chords.ly
I simply added added lowercase? To the definition of my-chord-name->pop-markup
Of course lowercase? Is of no use here. A better fix would be more invasive.
I didn't manage to fix:
filtering-parts-from-the-command-line.ly
mixed-meter---automatic-compound-time-signatures.ly
May I ask you and any other interested user for review and perhaps
ideas for the remaining files?
Thanks,
Harm
fixed-lsr-snippets.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
mixed-meter---automatic-compound-time-signatures.ly
Description: Text Data
filtering-parts-from-the-command-line.ly
Description: Text Data
- Re: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/18
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Jean-Alexis Montignies, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Carl Sorensen, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/19