[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:53:47 +0200 |
Hi David,
Am 5. März 2012 01:07 schrieb David Nalesnik <address@hidden>:
> Hi Harm,
>
>> I've just read the new description. Very nice!
>> Of course you're aware: doing a good job means that more work of this
>> kind will be offered. :)
>
>
> Ha, no problem.
>
> Oh, by the way, forgot to mention that I added to the actual snippet itself.
> Couldn't resist :)
>
> -David
>
seems the work is done.
LSR is on 2.14
Thanks a lot for all your help!!
Harm
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/03/31