Re: is shapeSlur broken?

[Thomas Morley]

2012/5/11 Thomas Morley <address@hidden>:
> Hi David,
>
> I thought a while about your function.
> I'd like to suggest some changes. In the attached file you can see:
>
> - Elimination of `function' as argument of shape-curve and introducing
> it as local variable.
> - A new condition added in shape-curve at the siblings-variable: ly:spanner?
> - In the music-function I added a new variable to specify the grob.
>
> These give the advantage to define only one music-function.
> Of course there is need to specify which grob should be applied.
>
> But now it works for all curves:
>
> Slur
> PhrasingSlur
> Tie
> RepeatTie
> LaissezVibrerTie
>
> I didn't test it very widly, but what do you think?
>
>
>
> Best,
>  Harm

Oops, forgot to delete the wrong version-number..
Please switch to \version "2.15.36" or higher.

-Harm