[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: partcombine and instrumentSwitch
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: partcombine and instrumentSwitch |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 06:02:23 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Jan-Peter Voigt <jp.voigt <at> gmx.de> writes:
> I am using partcombine in a piece, wich makes use of instrumentSwitch.
> Now this leads to a stack of 4 times "piccolo" in this example.
> Is this a bug or am I missing something?
> Is it maybe related to this issue 2253?
It is different from issue 2253 because, even with multiple separate voices
and no use of \partcombine, we would not want multiple individual "piccolo"
indications. This came up before at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-11/msg00180.html
You can use
\layout {
\context {\Voice \remove "Instrument_switch_engraver" }
\context {\Staff \consists "Instrument_switch_engraver" }
}
And I will post a suggestion on the bug-tracker to make this the default,
unless anyone here knows a reason to have instrument-change information set
individually for each voice.
- partcombine and instrumentSwitch, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2012/09/13
- Re: partcombine and instrumentSwitch, Thomas Morley, 2012/09/13
- Re: partcombine and instrumentSwitch,
Keith OHara <=
- Re: partcombine and instrumentSwitch, Daniel E. Moctezuma, 2012/09/14
- Re: partcombine and instrumentSwitch, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2012/09/14
- Re: partcombine and instrumentSwitch, David Kastrup, 2012/09/14
- Re: partcombine and instrumentSwitch, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2012/09/14
- Re: partcombine and instrumentSwitch, Thomas Morley, 2012/09/14
- Re: partcombine and instrumentSwitch, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2012/09/14
- Re: partcombine and instrumentSwitch, eluze, 2012/09/14
- Re: partcombine and instrumentSwitch, Keith OHara, 2012/09/22