Re: Guide to Writing Orchestral Scores with Lilypond?????

[Urs Liska]

Am 10.01.2013 09:33, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
> Hello Urs,
>
> Am 09.01.2013 um 17:31 schrieb Urs Liska:
> > Am 09.01.2013 13:48, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
> > > Am 09.01.2013 um 11:55 schrieb Urs Liska:
> > > > Am 09.01.2013 09:13, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
> > > > > I really would like to discuss this stuff with other ponders - but this list 
> > > > > should'nt be spoiled with such discussions and scare new users with intimate 
> > > > > scheme-expressions ...
> > > > > If we would find a place to meet, we could prepare either documentation material for 
> > > > > lilypond.org or for another lilypond related site. This might be 
> > > > > <address@hidden>? But I also don't want to distract important development work 
> > > > > in the basement!
> > > > If it really comes to a collaborative project I suggest setting up a dedicated 
> > > > mailing list.
> > > > Github doesn't provide mailing lists, so we should have another one elsewhere.
> > > > Any suggestions anyone?
> > > with the "Posaunenchor" (brass band), I used to play with, we 
> > > connected/organized with google groups. If all interested  ponders are on facebook, a 
> > > group could be formed there ... both solutions are a bit scary IMO ;)
> > > but it should be functional ...
> >  From those options I'd prefer Google over Facebook. Not less scary, but I'd 
> > consider Google more as a platform for actually _work_ together (although this 
> > might be strictly emotional ...).
> I would'nt say its emotional ;) FB is always scattered with ads and really 
> unimportant jokes - so its a playground and it is *not* mailing list. I've just 
> heard of people using it in such a way and it seems, almost anybody has an 
> account.
Thanks for pinning this down concisely ;-)
> > Is it possible to integrate a Google group with Google's issue tracker (as I 
> > find Github's issue tracker somewhat too simplistic)?
> I don't know, but it seems, google services are quite integrated.
That's what one has come to reasonably expect, and probably it's also 
true for our case.

So I suggest to create a Google Site (I can do that).
From the templates I have the impression we could use 'Project work 
site' or 'Project Wiki', but I can't see the relevant differences right 
now (and I don't know yet to what extent the site can be configured 
afterwards anyway).
Obviously Google Groups are directly integrated with a site (click on 
"Join our discussion" on the starting page of the Project Wiki preview), 
so this seems a good choice.

'Project work site' has an issue tracker, but maybe one can also add 
this to any other template ...
> > Do we actually need a _group_? Wouldn't a mailing list be enough?
> Francisco already said it, I think ... google groups acts like a mailing list 
> with integrated archive. One maintainer/admin needs a google account, the 
> members can access it with any address.
>
> So, shall we make a google group? I do have an infrequently used google account 
> and could create a group.
OK, that would be nice.


Would you mind also to create a tracker on Google Code (or check what 
options we'd have with a tracker within a Google Site)?

Best
Urs
> Cheers, Jan-Peter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user