[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Double slurs on automatic part combining
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Double slurs on automatic part combining |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Sep 2013 03:44:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Carl Peterson <address@hidden> writes:
> I am using the automatic part combiner in preparing SATB hymn sheets. The
> issue I have is that when the notes are chorded by the apc, if there is a
> slur (in both parts), only one slur is printed (as is seen in the
> documentation for automatic part combining).
Why would you use the part combiner? I know SATB as basically
\new ChoirStaff
<< \new Staff { \clef "treble" << { \soprano } \\ { \alto } >> }
\new Staff { \clef "bass" << { \tenor } \\ { \bass } >> }
>>
namely _without_ joining stems. At any rate, if you want soprano/alto
to retain upwards/downwards slurs, just write ^( and _( explicitly
(\slurUp/\slurDown is not strong enough).
--
David Kastrup
- Double slurs on automatic part combining, Carl Peterson, 2013/09/05
- Re: Double slurs on automatic part combining,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Double slurs on automatic part combining, David Rogers, 2013/09/05
- Re: Double slurs on automatic part combining, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/06
- Re: Double slurs on automatic part combining, Carl Peterson, 2013/09/06
- Re: Double slurs on automatic part combining, David Kastrup, 2013/09/06
- Re: Double slurs on automatic part combining, Carl Peterson, 2013/09/06