Re: Acciaccaturas and slashed stems

[Eluze]

Gilberto Agostinho wrote
> Hello everybody,
> 
> I have a question related to acciaccaturas and slashed stems. So the first
> one is: why when more than one note is inputed as acciaccaturas or slashed
> grace notes they are not automatically beamed? And why when I beam them I
> lose the slash?
> 
> \version "2.17.26"
> 
> {
> 
>   \relative c''{
> 
>     \time 3/4 {
> 
>       \acciaccatura e8 c4 \acciaccatura { e8 d } c4 \acciaccatura { e8[ d]
> } c4 |
> 
>       \slashedGrace e8 c4 \slashedGrace { e8 d } c4 \slashedGrace { e8[ d]
> } c4
> 
>     }
> 
>   }
> 
> }
> 
> 
> In my opinion, the last note of each bar should be as:
> http://www.mx.dico.unimi.it/reference_manual/images/acciaccatura2.gif
> 
> 
> * * *
> 
> 
> Something similar (related to the slashed stem), but now on regular notes.
> When I compile the code below, I get what I want: 4 unbeamed notes, and
> the
> first has a slash on its stem.
> 
> 
> \version "2.17.26"
> 
> {
> 
> \autoBeamOff
> 
> \relative c''{
> 
>     \once \override Flag #'stroke-style = #"grace" c8
> 
>     c c c r4 r2 |
> 
>   }
> 
> }
> 
> 
> Now if I remove the line \autoBeamOff, the notes will be beamed but
> without
> the slash on the first!

in the NR there is

Known issues and warnings
A multi-note beamed acciaccatura is printed without a slash, and looks
exactly the same as a
multi-note beamed appoggiatura.

you may want to look at this snippet:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=721

hth
Eluze



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Acciaccaturas-and-slashed-stems-tp150981p150982.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.