Re: add stems to rests under a beam?

[Jacques Menu]

Hello Andrew,

I seen to get what you want with the followin, maybe with too long stems though :

  \override Stem.stemlet-length = #0.75

Can you try that?

JM

Le 7 août 2015 à 15:25, N. Andrew Walsh <address@hidden> a écrit :

PS- obviously, that's a typo in the first paragraph of my last message: it should read "16th note with a secondary BEAM" (not stem). Anyway, here attached is a (really terrible freehand GIMP-made) drawing of what I want to see. 

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:12 PM, N. Andrew Walsh <address@hidden>wrote:

Hi David/Andrew/'ponders,

actually, what I want is two things: that the stem extends downward from the beam, and that this stemlet is connected to the following 16th note with a secondary stem. As it is now, the secondary beam stops midway between the c16 and the r16. 

In short, what I want to see is that the beams look exacty the same whether it's a note or a rest under them. Setting stem length with the \verride fixes the first part, but does it also achieve the latter?

Cheers,

A

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:57 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:

"N. Andrew Walsh" <address@hidden> writes:

> So, I have the following:

> { c2~ c4 c8[ r16 c16] | c4 }
>
> in Lily, the r16 does not get a stem, nor a second beam, which looks …
> muddled. How do I change this behavior?

\override Stem.stemlet-length = #0.5

--
David Kastrup

<french beaming.png>_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user