[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 13:32:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
BB <address@hidden> writes:
> \version "2.18.0"
> #(set-global-staff-size 25)
>
> {
> \override TextScript.color = #red
> c4^p c4-p c-2 c-3 c-4
> c^\markup { \finger "2 - 3" }
> }
>
>
> I think I understand what you think to be wrong.
> Obviously you are refrencing to version 2.10.33 stable branch of ilypond
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/user/lilypond/Fingering-instructions
> I cannot find that chapter in subsequent manuals.
Uh, that chapter does not prescribe c4-p or similar.
And it is pretty much transferred to
<URL:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/inside-the-staff#fingering-instructions>
> There are two systems to mark the fingering with guitar, one with an
> number, the other with characters p, i, etc.
Uh, no? The numbers are for the left hand fingers, the characters are
for the right hand fingers.
> Obviously newer versions of lilypond handle the characters simply as
> markup and not so special as in version 2.10.
Uh no? 2.10 handled -p as a text script. So does 2.18, with the
exception that c-p is considered a single word, so you need to write
c -p or c- p or c-"p" in order to get the same output as previously.
> So the minus in front of a p ("-p") obviously will be handled as a _p
> and the p printed under the note. I do not know if that is an error or
> a mistake in developing to higer versions of lilypond. I cannot tell
> you if developers find that faulty and are willing to make a
> correction?
Making c-p a single word in all modes was very much deliberate and done
in version 2.15.43. See
<URL:https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2702>.
> On 16.08.2015 12:13, Simon Albrecht wrote:
>> { c"p" }
No, he didn't. He wrote { c-"p" }.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, (continued)
Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, Nick Payne, 2015/08/15
- Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, BB, 2015/08/16
- Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, Simon Albrecht, 2015/08/16
- Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, BB, 2015/08/16
- Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, BB, 2015/08/16
- Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, Trevor Daniels, 2015/08/16
- Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, BB, 2015/08/16
- Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, David Kastrup, 2015/08/16
- Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, BB, 2015/08/16
- Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, Simon Albrecht, 2015/08/16
- Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, BB, 2015/08/16
- Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, David Kastrup, 2015/08/16
Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, Thomas Morley, 2015/08/16
Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, Simon Albrecht, 2015/08/16
Re: Can't find right hand fingering without string #'s, David Kastrup, 2015/08/16