[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Randomness in layout
From: |
Andrew Bernard |
Subject: |
Re: Randomness in layout |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 21:46:27 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.150807 |
Hi Malte,
This is exactly what the OP requested. Although admirable technically,
aesthetically, to me, with the clash between the precision engraving and the
slurs, it looks disturbing, and erroneous. Just my two cents worth - it’s a
topic I have been musing on for a long time. And lilypond is largely about
aesthetics, after all (otherwise we would all be using Those Other Programs).
Later on when we teach computers how to write properly with a pen in fine
copperplate script, all this will become easy. :-)
Andrew
On 21/08/2015 21:16, "Malte Meyn" <address@hidden on behalf of address@hidden>
wrote:
>
>
>Am 21.08.2015 um 12:55 schrieb Malte Meyn:
>> I think that it should be possible to redefine "(" to tweak every slur
>> with some randomness.
>
>Here you go:
>
- Randomness in layout, Sharon Rosner, 2015/08/21
- Re: Randomness in layout, Andrew Bernard, 2015/08/21
- Re: Randomness in layout, tisimst, 2015/08/21
- Re: Randomness in layout, David Kastrup, 2015/08/21
- Re: Randomness in layout, David Nalesnik, 2015/08/21
- Re: Randomness in layout, tisimst, 2015/08/21
- Re: Randomness in layout, David Nalesnik, 2015/08/21
- Re: Randomness in layout, David Nalesnik, 2015/08/21
- Patch/issue procedures (was: Randomness in layout), David Kastrup, 2015/08/22