Re: LilyJAZZ

[Blöchl Bernhard]

It might be helpful to have lilyjazz examples old/new side by side with 
explicite evidence to the unbeautiful elements?

I just got the "new" version happily to work. I cannot make such 
examples as I do not have the old/new version working simultaneosly. I 
fear my lilypond skills are not sufficiant to handle both versions side 
by side.

Regards


Am 23.08.2015 23:42, schrieb tisimst:
> Tim,
>
> Would you mind expounding a little further on what you feel has
> degraded since the original was published? I will tell you what I've
> done, but I would appreciate hearing your thoughts, especially if
> many others feel similarly.
>
> In bringing the original LilyJAZZ font up to speed, I don't
> recall editing ANY of the original glyphs in the font. I did _add_
> some to make it more complete, but that's it. 
>
> The other thing that might be causing visual is the stylesheet I've
> created to go along with the font family. If that's the problem,
> please help me out by offering some suggestions. I've created
> settings that I thought were reasonable and compliment the font, but
> that doesn't mean they have to stay that way. I guess the nice thing
> is that you can adapt it to whatever styles _you_ like.
>
> Please help me know, if you would. Thanks!!
>
> - Abraham
>
> On Sunday, August 23, 2015, Tim McNamara [via Lilypond] <[hidden
> email] [7]> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 23, 2015, at 1:37 PM, Tim McNamara <[hidden email] [1]>
> > wrote:
> > > > On Aug 23, 2015, at 6:56 AM, BB <[hidden email] [2]> wrote:
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > Does anybody sucessful use LilyJAZZ?
> > >
> > > Yes, I have been using it for over a year with excellent results,
> > although there are some quirks.  For example, it kills bar
> > numbering.  It also interferes with improvisationOn and I have to
> > turn off LilyJazz to be able to use that. Also, looking at the web
> > page that was referenced in other threads, it appears that the old
> > LilyJAZZ font has been completely replaced (looking at the example
> > lead sheet).  To my eyes the old font was much better and I won’t
> > be updating to the new version.  The new version looks awkward and
> > doesn’t visually flow very well.  YMMV.
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > [hidden email] [3]
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user [4]
> >
> > -------------------------
> >
> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> > discussion below:
> > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LilyJAZZ-tp179970p180026.html
> > [5]
> > To start a new topic under User, email <a
> href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;address@hidden&#39;);"
> > target="_blank">address@hidden
> > To unsubscribe from Lilypond, click here.
> > NAML [6]
>
> -------------------------
>  View this message in context: Re: LilyJAZZ [8]
>  Sent from the User mailing list archive [9] at Nabble.com.
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&amp;node=180026&amp;i=0
> [2] http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&amp;node=180026&amp;i=1
> [3] http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&amp;node=180026&amp;i=2
> [4] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> [5] http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LilyJAZZ-tp179970p180026.html
> [6]
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&amp;id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&amp;base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&amp;breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> [7]
> http://webmailer.telecolumbus.net/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=180036&i=0
> [8] http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/LilyJAZZ-tp179970p180036.html
> [9] http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user