[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change size of notes in addQuote passage
From: |
Owain Sutton |
Subject: |
Re: Change size of notes in addQuote passage |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 01:34:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23+102 (2ca89bed6448) (2014-03-12) |
Indeed. I did manage to miss the Score.quotedCueEventTypes part of the docs
before, my error.
I'd prefer not to have to list the events in this way, I just want everything
included, and listing them sets up the potential for error, in omitting some.
As I indicated earlier, I don't know whether 'cue' or 'quote' is the right
option from a programmatic point of view. 'Cue' is certainly the colloquial
term among musicians for such a part, though!
On 19:41, Mon 24 Aug 2015, Wols Lists wrote:
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:41:04 +0100
> From: Wols Lists <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Change size of notes in addQuote passage
> To: address@hidden
> List-Id: LilyPond user discussion <lilypond-user.gnu.org>
>
> On 24/08/15 19:32, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> > Am 24.08.2015 um 18:59 schrieb address@hidden:
> >> Is there a way to (a) use 'transposedCueDuring' which retains these
> >> details
> >> from the original,
>
> > Yes, see
> > <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/writing-parts#index-quotedCueEventTypes>.
> >
> > Although actually a ‘cue’, as you are probably aware, is intended for
> > notes which the instrument is not supposed to actually play.
> >
> Although actually a 'cue', as you are probably aware, is often played by
> the wrong instrument in amateur bands because the instrument it's
> written for is not there ... :-) :-) :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Wol
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>