[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Super and sub
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: Super and sub |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Feb 2016 22:46:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
Am 6. Februar 2016 22:24:41 MEZ, schrieb John Gourlay <address@hidden>:
>Joram,
>
>As you say, LaTeX is for producing beautiful mathematics and LilyPond
>is for producing beautiful music. It’s possible that the conventions in
>the two different kinds of typography differ in their placement of sub
>and superscripts, and so LaTeX and LilyPond should differ in their
>behavior.
I'm sure Joram is not speaking of formulas but of superscript in plain text
paragraphs. And I don't see why we shouldn't take LaTeX with its decades of
typesetting experience as a model for the plain text parts of LilyPond scores.
If LilyPond scores contain text areas they should of course look good, and
there is much room for improvement here.
My 2 Ct.
Urs
>This seems like the first question that should be answered
>before asking whether LilyPond is making the best placement choices.
>I’ll let people with more experience in music notation weigh in.
>
>John Gourlay
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
- Re: Super and sub, (continued)
- Re: Super and sub, John Gourlay, 2016/02/06
- Re: Super and sub, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/02/06
- Re: Super and sub,
Urs Liska <=
- Re: Super and sub, David Kastrup, 2016/02/07
- Re: Super and sub, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/02/07
- Re: Super and sub, Noeck, 2016/02/07
- Re: Super and sub, Simon Albrecht, 2016/02/07
- Re: Super and sub, Noeck, 2016/02/07
- Re: Super and sub, Phil Holmes, 2016/02/07
- Re: Super and sub, Simon Albrecht, 2016/02/07
- Re: Super and sub, Urs Liska, 2016/02/07