Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator

[David Wright]

On Thu 03 Nov 2016 at 18:00:59 (-0700), mclaren wrote:
> "Wouldn't that rather be (4 + 2/3)/4?"
> 
> Yes, I think you're right. 1/3 is presumably half of the value of a triplet
> quarter note, so 1 triplet eighth note. I've corrected that in my second
> Lilypond example. My bad.
> 
> Change the "6" denominator in my new Lilypond code to a 3 to get the meter
> to display correctly. But the measures do print correctly, so this code
> should get what Tobin Chodos wants, I think, 4 quarter notes + 1 triplet
> eighth in every measure.

I think Joram pointed that out in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-10/msg00584.html
and most/all of this discussion has made that assumption. AFAIK the
OP has neither confirmed nor disagreed with this change.

Cheers,
David.