[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OOoLilyPond
From: |
Noeck |
Subject: |
Re: OOoLilyPond |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Dec 2016 08:50:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
Hi,
> IIRC it is officially unmaintained.
> Quite a pity ...
If there is interest in maintaining it, I think the original author
would agree to do so. I don't remember if there is a license with it,
but I can dig out the conversation with the author next week.
IIUC, the extension is just a compressed (zip?) set of files, so the
required changes could be combined again in a compressed file and
published, once the license is clear. Such a best-effort maintenance
might be better than nothing.
Cheers,
Joram
- Re: OOoLilyPond,
Noeck <=
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Urs Liska, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, David Kastrup, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Urs Liska, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Wols Lists, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Wols Lists, 2017/01/01
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Urs Liska, 2017/01/02
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Urs Liska, 2017/01/02
- Python LiLily (was: OOoLilyPond), Urs Liska, 2017/01/02
- Re: OOoLilyPond, Klaus Blum, 2017/01/02