On 2 Feb 2017, at 20:56, David Wright <address@hidden> wrote:
Yes, the idea was to just add "2x" to a repeat with two alternatives. How would that look, in your view?
Isn't there a danger that the "2x" will be seem as merely a redundant
reinforcement of an ordinary repeat unless you mark the end of the
second alternative.
It is ambiguous, indeed, in view of the alternatives.
Otherwise, I used the "1, 3", "2", "4" variation, which looks fine.
How good it looks might depend on the relative scale of the repeated
section and the alternatives.
