Re: Separate Emmentaler/Fonts

[Urs Liska]

Am 11.04.2017 um 12:09 schrieb N. Andrew Walsh:

Hi Urs,

thanks for the link. I only needed the font for specific glyphs (sharp signs and the like), which I presume are individual glyphs that would still work within a body of regular text, yes?

Yes, but you have to know how to find/access them in the font.

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:

Of course you have to note that the fonts will not work anywhere outside LilyPond.

Well, if you're using LaTeX (haha) you can easily make use of it using that package (which is also part of TeXLive (which also means the fonts are present in that too)).

Well, *I* certainly use LaTeX, like a civilized person, but my partners in this project are philistines. I tried explaining how you and I proofed your paper over git, and all I got was a blank stare. I think the vast majority of the (text) publishing world still basically operates as if they're using hard copies. I throw up just thinking about it.

I just got a review of a paper I had to submit as a Word document. I used styles for special content (like "composer", "work title" etc.) and - as I usually do - colored them so I can immediately see that I have applied the right style.

The first comment from the reviewer was to apologize for the significant number of edits that are all marked by Word because he first "had to remove all the colors and italics I had introduced to the text".
OMG.

Urs

Cheers,

A

-- 
address@hidden
https://openlilylib.org
http://lilypondblog.org