Re: version number rejection

[David Wright]

On Sun 16 Apr 2017 at 20:35:41 (+0100), Steve Downes wrote:
> I attach a short script together with the rejection notice. I feel
> confident I shall feel foolish when I recieve a reply but what am I
> doing wrong here?
> 
> The version number is correct. & the same as my previous work.
> 
> I can see no problem with the script as far as it's gone & neither,
>   apparently, can the compiler.
> 
> I attach the scrip &  compilers output.
> 
> 
> Script>
> 
> \version "2.18.2"
> 
> {
>   \new ChordNames \with {
>   \override BarLine.bar-extent = #'(-2 . 2)
>   \consists "Bar_engraver"
>   }
>   \chordmode {
>   \time 4/4
>  }
> % intro Gtr only
> r2 gis4:13/fgis g4:13 |
> c1:maj7 |
> g2:m9 cis4:7.5+ c4:9 |
> f2:min9 bes:13 |
> a2:m7 aes:7 |
> d2:min7 g:7 |
> c2:maj7 cis:dim7 |
> d2:m7 g:7.+5 \bar "||"|
> 
> > End of Script
> 
> > start of compiler script
> 

>From this point...

> address@hidden:~/studio/lildat/misty$ lilypond cds.ly
> GNU LilyPond 2.18.2
> Processing `cds.ly'
> Parsing...
> cds.ly:1: warning: no \version statement found, please add
> 
> \version "2.18.2"
> 
> for future compatibility
> Success: compilation successfully completed
> address@hidden:~/studio/lildat/misty$

...to this point, the output is exactly what one would expect
to see when cds.ly is an empty file.

Cheers,
David.