Re: How make "piece" behave?

[Bernhard Kleine]

Am 23.10.2017 um 08:58 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Bernhard Kleine <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Am 22.10.2017 um 22:11 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> Bernhard Kleine <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> I have Missa Brevis KV 259 and so far 6 input files where the header is
>>>>
>>>>> \header {
>>>>>   piece = "Sanctus"
>>>>> }
>>>>  the master file is \version "2.19.49"
>>>>> \language "deutsch"
>>>>>  #(set-global-staff-size 15)
>>>>>
>>>>> \header {
>>>>>   title = "Missa brevis in C"
>>>>>   subtitle = "Orgelsolo-Messe"
>>>>>   subsubtitle = "für Soli, Chor, Orchester und Orgel"
>>>>>   composer = "Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart"
>>>>>   opus = "KV 259"
>>>>> }
>>>>> \include "Wolfgang-Amadeus-Mozart-Missa-brevis-in-C_Kyrie.ly"
>>>>> \include "Wolfgang-Amadeus-Mozart-Missa-brevis-in-C_Gloria.ly"
>>>>> \include "Wolfgang-Amadeus-Mozart-Missa-brevis-in-C_Sanctus.ly"
>>>>> \include "Wolfgang-Amadeus-Mozart-Missa-brevis-in-C_Benedictus.ly"
>>>>> \include "Wolfgang-Amadeus-Mozart-Missa-brevis-in-C_AgnusDei.ly"
>>>>> \include "Wolfgang-Amadeus-Mozart-Missa-brevis-in-C_DonaNobisPacem.ly"
>>>> Strange thing is that all pieces are labeled "Dona nobis pacem", the
>>>> name of the very last piece. A previous Missa von Bruckner where the
>>>> above file was taken from had not this problem. Please advice how to get
>>>> it correct.
>>> I suggest you look for structural differences in the respective included
>>> files.  I am pretty sure that this is not the fault of the composer
>>> being Mozart.
>>>
>> You are correct that Mr. Mozart never worked with files. However, I
>> noticed that the Bruckner pieces had a ( last) line:
>> % -*- master: Anton-Bruckner-Messe-in-C.ly;
>>
>> Applying this line and changing it to
>> % -*- master: Wolfgang-Amadeus-Mozart-Missa-brevis-in-C.ly
> That's a comment for the sake of the editor.  It is not relevant for
> LilyPond.
>
>> didnot change the strange behaviour that all pieces are labeled Dona
>> nobis pacem. What else did I miss?
> I suggest you look for _structural_ differences in the respective
> included files.  How is the music organized with your Mozart, how is it
> organized with your Bruckner?  LilyPond does not mind the different
> composers, but you obviously have a difference in what constructs your
> repective music passages appear in.
>
> Are they all in a \score of their own?  Do those \score constructs have
> a \header of their own?
>
When adding in the piece file the header to \score it was correct.
Before I had the header at the start of the piece file. Is there
anything in Lilypond documentation about \header within / out of 
\score. I did not see it.

BTW The Bruckner files are labeled part1_... , part2_... etc., the
Mozart files are not. What I noticed that the Bruckner pieces open in
Frescobaldi with the master file, while the the Mozart files open
single. How is this achieved?

Thanks for helping with this and for all the beautiful work with Lilypond!!!

-- 
spitzhalde9
D-79853 lenzkirch
address@hidden
www.b-kleine.com, www.urseetal.net
-
thunderbird mit enigmail
GPG schlüssel: D5257409
fingerprint:
08 B7 F8 70 22 7A FC C1 15 49 CA A6 C7 6F A0 2E D5 25 74 09

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature