|
| From: | Urs Liska |
| Subject: | Re: using lilypond in LaTeX (MacTeX) |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Feb 2018 16:23:11 +0100 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
Am 19.02.2018 um 16:15 schrieb Br. Samuel Springuel:
My personal choice is #2, but I might be slightly biased as I help out on that project.
The main argument that could speak against that is the requirement to use LuaLaTeX (instead of XeLaTeX, pdfLaTeX, or even more low-level variants).
Urs
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |