|Subject:||Re: Having trouble understanding optional and variable amount of arguments|
|Date:||Fri, 9 Mar 2018 08:18:09 +0100|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0|
Am 08.03.2018 um 23:46 schrieb Stefano Troncaro:
I'll think about it later today, just a few short comments for now:
Very good point.
I'm not sure this is relevant. You don't need to put them around untyped options but you have to add another layer around everything.
What I liked about my implementation (as opposed to the first ideas) was that it's flat, a simple list of lists. But probably I'll consider this as weighing less than 1)
I don't have a strong opinion on that on first sight.
What you're proposing is focused on the POV of the *caller* of the function (i.e. the document author), while my approach was focused on what the *code* needs to be present.
As said I'll have to think more closely about it later today, but you may have a good point here too.
You may of course open a pull request. Maybe we'll discuss details but I have no objections so far.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|