Re: Thriple flat/sharp glyphs...

[Urs Liska]

Am 12.03.2018 um 17:07 schrieb Torsten Hämmerle:
> Hi Urs,
>
> Many thanks for having a look.
>
>
>
> Urs Liska-3 wrote
> > I don't like the combination of sharp plus doublesharp - but if that's
> > the way it seems to be done, then we shouldn't invent something new.
> I'm not too happy about it either, that's one of the reasons I'm asking
> here.
> The only "allowed" variation would be the tiny gap between the # and the
> x...
> (or swapping to x# instead of #x, but that doesn't seem to be the current
> "standard", if one can speak of a standard at all).
>
>
>
> Urs Liska-3 wrote
> > Could you please resend the example image without the circles? I'd like
> > to get an impression of the actual looks on the page.
> Yes, of course!
> I'll attach the whole page I'm currently testing with as a PDF file, then
> you can have a thorough look at any desired magnification.
>
> test-issue3356.pdf
> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t3887/test-issue3356.pdf>
>
> There is (among others) a third example containing a rather unfortunate #x
> that takes a lot of horizontal space as the # can't be squeezed below the
> dot (it's too high).

Why is that so? From the actual height on the page there shouldn't be an 
issue having it below the dot. Is there a padding or an Y-extent that 
disturbes?

> The glyphs are built using existing character drawing routines and bouding
> box widths exactly match the original character's left and right "margins".

I can't comment on the implementation, but IMHO it looks fine.

Best
Urs

> Thanks again
> Torsten
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user