|
From: | Karlin High |
Subject: | Re: Is lilypond really suitable for composing? |
Date: | Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:52:57 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
On 3/25/2018 6:43 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Apparently you haven’t been to any new classical music concerts in the last half-century. It’s*quite* clear that many composers — especially inexperienced ones — have no problem composing dissonant pieces without access to the the actual timbre and overtone composition of the music they’re writing.
"There was a time when the first performance of a recent commission struck fear into the most broad-minded listener. We used to brace ourselves for horror and were rarely disappointed. In those days, the struggle to write more atonally than the next man was palpable. No self-respecting composer would pen a concord if he wanted to be taken seriously by his peers: to do so was to be compared to those who made soft-harmony arrangements of famous melodies. Now soft harmony has become dignified, with all manner of clever names — tintinnabuli, holy minimalism; while popular tunes are quickly identified as being ‘chant’, and quoted whole.
" - Peter Phillips <https://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/12/why-church-music-is-back-in-vogue-and-squeaky-gate-music-has-had-its-day/> -- Karlin High Missouri, USA
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |