|
From: | Simon Albrecht |
Subject: | Re: {SPAM 01.9} Re: Tie across voices |
Date: | Fri, 4 May 2018 23:55:51 +0200 |
On 04.05.2018 19:23, David Sumbler wrote:
It seems that if, in a <<{\musicA} {\musicB}>> passage, \musicA does not specify a new Voice, then the music before the << >> passage and, importantly, also the music afterwards will all be treated as belonging to the same voice. Is that correct?
Have a look at this example: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% \version "2.19.80" << c c >> \new Staff << c c >> \new Staff << c \\ c >> \new Staff \new Voice << c c >> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% resulting in the attached output.<<>> just combines music expressions simultaneously. Depending on which contexts are explicitly created, separate implicit contexts will be created or not.
Best, Simon
Screenshot from 2018-05-04 23-54-04.png
Description: PNG image
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |