[lmi-commits] [lmi] master 649d990 02/10: Improve documentation

[Greg Chicares]

branch: master
commit 649d990970f875bdaf49cace9e5dcd4ea4710bbb
Author: Gregory W. Chicares <address@hidden>
Commit: Gregory W. Chicares <address@hidden>

    Improve documentation
---
 so_attributes.hpp | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/so_attributes.hpp b/so_attributes.hpp
index 90e2117..b2f8c12 100644
--- a/so_attributes.hpp
+++ b/so_attributes.hpp
@@ -25,11 +25,11 @@
 // If LMI_USE_SO_ATTRIBUTES is not defined, then LMI_SO is ignored.
 // This is the default behavior. Otherwise:
 //
-// - For gcc-3.4 or later, if the platform is not msw, then elf is
-// assumed, and symbols decorated with LMI_SO have 'default'
-// visibility. This is intended to be used with '-fvisibility=hidden'.
-// This implementation hasn't yet been tested; it is based on
-// comments given here
+// - For gcc (or any other toolchain that defines gcc macros), if the
+// platform is not msw, then elf is assumed, and symbols decorated
+// with LMI_SO have 'default' visibility. This is intended to be used
+// with '-fvisibility=hidden'. This implementation hasn't yet been
+// tested; it is based on comments given here
 //   http://mail.python.org/pipermail/c++-sig/2004-April/007139.html
 // by the author of the gcc 'visibility' patch.
 //
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
 // compatible attribute for symbol visibility, a feature for which
 // significant benefits are claimed:
 //   http://www.nedprod.com/programs/gccvisibility.html
+//   https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility
 // The elf 'visibility' and msw dll 'declspec' attributes are similar
 // enough to use the same decoration macro, but they do different
 // things. In code that uses the shared object, the macro has an