[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hair-thin line & @FootNote divided from the word
From: |
Jeff Kingston |
Subject: |
Re: Hair-thin line & @FootNote divided from the word |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Nov 1998 08:43:17 +1000 |
From address@hidden Sat Nov 21 10:13:08 1998
Received: by staff.cs.usyd.edu.au with postie; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 10:13:08
+1000
Received: from doors.ptc.spbu.ru. by staff.cs.usyd.edu.au.; Sat, 21 Nov
1998 10:13:05 +1100
Received: (from address@hidden)
by doors.ptc.spbu.ru (8.9.1a/8.9.1/OL.cf-3.1beta) id CAA02067;
Sat, 21 Nov 1998 02:03:09 +0300 (MSK)
Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 02:03:09 +0300 (MSK)
X-Original-Received: from snark.ptc.spbu.ru (snark.ptc.spbu.ru
[195.19.225.131])
by doors.ptc.spbu.ru (8.9.1a/8.9.1/OL.cf-3.1beta) with ESMTP id CAA02016
for <address@hidden>; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 02:02:50 +0300 (MSK)
X-Original-Received: (from address@hidden)
by snark.ptc.spbu.ru (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id CAA04178
for address@hidden; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 02:02:49 +0300 (MSK)
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 02:02:49 +0300
From: "Valeriy E. Ushakov" <address@hidden>
To: Lout Mailing List <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Hair-thin line & @FootNote divided from the word
Mail-Followup-To: Lout Mailing List <address@hidden>
References: <address@hidden>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i
In-Reply-To:
=?koi8-r?Q?=3C1318D78C9072D11195C9006094EA98A7137B86=40ocesrv=3E=3B_from?=
=?koi8-r?Q?_Mat=ECj_Cepl_on_Tue=2C_Oct_27=2C_1998_at_09:14:31AM_-0000?=
Resent-Message-ID: <"hx0TsB.A.Jg.sUfV2"@doors.ptc.spbu.ru>
Resent-From: address@hidden
X-Mailing-List: <address@hidden> archive/latest/854
X-Loop: address@hidden
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: address@hidden
On Tue, Oct 27, 1998 at 09:14:31AM -0000, Matìj Cepl wrote:
> 2) When I put @FootNote in a text like this:
>
> xxx xxxxxxxxx xxxx xxxxx @FootNote { .... }. mmmm mm mmm m
>
> it happens, that when footnote gets into the end of line, lout breaks a
> line awfully, putting footnote mark on a new line. Like this:
>
> xxx xxxxxxxxx xxxx xxxxx
> 1. mmmm mm mmm m
>
> I tried to overcome this by putting "~" between footnote and word which
> it is bound to, but it doesn't work (lout breaks a line between the word
> and footnote mark anyway) and really I did not want to have anything
> between word and its footnote. So, I tried " &0.01s", but the result was
> the same (and it is not very logical markup, isn't it?).
Hmm, in my copy of a user's guide (formatted with my win32 binaries) I
can see this same problem near the bottom of page 117 (section 7.2
"Symbols", the footnote is about options to `matrix' symbol).
I tried to use explicit unbreakable zero width gap (with example from
Dominikus Herzberg) but to no avail. I had no time to look closely
into this yet.
SY, Uwe
--
address@hidden | Zu Grunde kommen
http://www.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen
This is a known but that will be fixed in the next release.
Jeff