[Ltib] Re: add -DZ_PREFIX

[hong zhang]

Stuart,

That is greate. When you are ready please let me know
so that I can get most recent LTIB and merge with my
kernel/BSP. I have another job done is port imx31 with
kernel/BSP to company's custom board. This is why I
need merge and more packages. Current goal is to have
firefox work on imx31 LCD. It asks for pango, atk, and
fontconfig. Can you look into fontconfig and pango in
20071008 release?

---henry

--- Stuart Hughes <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi Henry, 
> 
> There is information on pkg-config here:
> http://pkg-config.freedesktop.org/wiki/
> but basically when set up right, when a package
> build needs interface
> headers/libraries from another package it can run
> pkg-config queries to
> find out where and what headers/libraries it needs
> to use in it
> compile/link command lines.
> 
> Normally this doesn't work properly when cross
> compiling, but I've added
> a patch in LTIB so that it does (see pkgconfig.spec
> :
> pkg-config-0.21-prefix_mungling.patch).  This in
> conjunction with the
> spoofing system means that pkg-config works without
> having to do
> anything special while building within LTIB.  This
> has been tested when
> I did the original work to get the gstreamer set of
> packages to build
> properly.
> 
> The only caveat is that you'll need a recent LTIB to
> get hold of this,
> it's not yet available in the Savannah CVS copy (but
> I will be merging
> out soon).
> 
> Regards, Stuart
> 
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 10:59 -0700, hong zhang wrote:
> > Stuart,
> > 
> > I think Z_PREFIX is not needed any more for
> compiling
> > DirectFB. Trouble is I really not quite understand
> > pkg_conifg for. Do you know where is information
> about
> > it so that I can learn it?
> > 
> > ---henry
> > 
> > --- Stuart Hughes <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Henry,
> > > 
> > > Are you using the LTIB from an iso image, if so
> what
> > > version? or are you
> > > using the version from bitshrine/savannah?  The
> > > reason I ask is that I
> > > pending merge out to bitshrine/savannah that
> makes
> > > pkg_config work
> > > properly in a cross compiled environment and
> > > possibly that will help you
> > > (you won't need to specify the pkg_config files
> on
> > > configure line).  If
> > > you have a recent Freescale ISO it will already
> have
> > > these updates.
> > > 
> > > I didn't understand your question about Z_PREFIX
> ?
> > > 
> > > Regards, Stuart
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 09:45 -0700, hong zhang
> wrote:
> > > > Stuart,
> > > > 
> > > > After adding
> > > >
> LIBPNG_CONFIG="$(HOST_DIR)/bin/libpng12-config" \
> > > >  and DirectFB build successfully with
> > > > --with-gfxdrivers=none. But still have error
> > > without
> > > > --with-gfxdrivers=none.
> > > > 
> > > > Why do you think Z_PREFIX will be turned on
> > > default?
> > > > 
> > > > ---henry
> > > > 
> > > > --- Stuart Hughes <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hi Henry,
> > > > > 
> > > > > LTIB will find the headers in rootfs in
> > > preference
> > > > > to the toolchain.
> > > > > 
> > > > > To add this flag, it would probably work by
> > > changing
> > > > > the spec file to:
> > > > > 
> > > > > CFLAGS="-DZ_PREFIX" \
> > > > > ./configure --enable-shared --host=$CFGHOST
> > > > > --build=%{_build} \
> > > > > ....
> > > > > 
> > > > > What does this flag do, and do you know why
> the
> > > > > things it turns on in
> > > > > zconf.h are not enabled by default?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Regards, Stuart
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 15:27 -0700, hong
> zhang
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > Stuart,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I want to add -DZ_PREFIX to turn on inside
> > > > > zconf.h.
> > > > > > Where should I add  -DZ_PREFIX  in
> > > DirectFB.spec?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > When I upgrade zlib and I found library
> header
> > > > > files
> > > > > > in toolchain is not upgraded and rootfs is
> > > > > upgraded.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > ---henry
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best
> spam
> > > > > protection around 
> > > > > > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > > protection around 
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com