Re: [Ltib] linux kernel tarball versions

[Stuart Hughes]

Hi Jürgen,

Note you can run: bin/listpkginfo -b
to get a cross referenced listing of the content being referenced and
therefore on the GPP).

If you can submit an update that'd be great.  Sending a request/note to
Freecale may get them to consider supporting this (officially).

Regards, Stuart


On 04/03/11 07:51, Jürgen Lambrecht wrote:
> On 03/03/2011 09:37 PM, Stuart Hughes wrote:
>> Hi Jurgen,
>>
>> There's no trial and error, unless there a reference from a .spec file,
>> then it doesn't (officially) exist in LTIB.
> OK, I didn't know. So just 'll dist/lfs-5.1/kernel/'.
>> To tell if something is referenced, run ./ltib -m config and look at the
>> available kernels.  If it's not there, it will need to be added.
>>
>> For this Freescale platform, it's work asking what they have in their
>> latest BSPs and encourage them to push out what they have to the public
>> LTIB project.
> They don't work on the imx27pdk anymore.
> I will try to submit it to ltib.
>> Regards, Stuart
>>
>>
>> On 03/03/11 13:46, Jürgen Lambrecht wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I would like to upgrade to linux kernel v2.6.35.? for my imx27pdk; it is
>>> now at 2.6.22.
>>>
>>> With trial and error, I found that linux-2.6.35.tar.bz2 is not available
>>> from http://www.bitshrine.org/gpp/, the latest is I think
>>> linux-2.6.34.tar.bz2.
>>> Is there a better way that trial and error?
>>>
>>> I also want to commit the imx27pdk platform port to 2.6.35 back to
>>> LTIB-Savanah, but I guess then that linux tarball should be in the GPP?
>>>
>>> I selected kernel version 2.6.35 because linux-imx uses that stable
>>> version (2.6.35.3 is the latest tag) and also LFS uses that version
>>> (2.6.35.4 according to wikipedia))
>>> On kernel.org, 2.6.35.11 is the longterm stable.
>>> But the linux stable of 2.6.35 is 2.6.35.9 - I would expect the longterm
>>> to have a lower number than the stable?
>>> (maybe with "longterm" they mean a "stable" one selected also for
>>> longterm support?)
>>> But, I guess I should go for 2.6.35.11?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Jürgen
>>>
> 
>