[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE : [lwip-devel] Snmp changes
From: |
Goldschmidt Simon |
Subject: |
RE : [lwip-devel] Snmp changes |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Apr 2007 10:19:08 +0200 |
> Ok. I just think is "strange" to only use "g_" prefix in this
> case (snmp_ is more in lwip style?). Is it something to
Ok, you're probably right about that. I only wanted to get rid of the
warning. And as I don't even know what than name 'at_node' stands for
(I'm not even using the snmp part), I didn't know a better name for it.
> define or add in the contrib.txt ? I also got a style
> question: there is some extra LF in some code. Is it to avoid
> to reach column 80 (or other)? Is there any rules to respect
Yes, I think.
> on that? I prefer to let editors do the "break" than do it
> manually, just because all editors don't do it with the same rules
The problem is that some editors don't break the line and you can't see
anything beyond, say, 90 lines.