Re: [lwip-devel] [task #6683] Document lwIPs threadsafety requirements

[Jonathan Larmour]

Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
> Oh, and FD_SETSIZE not depending on NUM_SOCKETS looks like a bug which
> should
> go into the bug tracker, doesn't it?

Actually I was just going to go ahead and fix this since it's trivial.

> (I don't think it is necessary to let it be dependent on
> MEMP_NUM_NETCONN - if
> the user has set NUM_SOCKETS higher than MEMP_NUM_NETCONN it's his fault
> to waste
> memory, I think)

BTW, NUM_SOCKETS is unconditionally defined to MEMP_NUM_NETCONN at the top 
of sockets.c so it must be the same. Maybe it should be a separate option, 
but I think the idea is that in general if someone's using the BSD API, 
they probably aren't _also_ using the netconn API separately.

Jifl
--
eCosCentric Limited      http://www.eCosCentric.com/     The eCos experts
Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK.       Tel: +44 1223 245571
Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071.
------["The best things in life aren't things."]------      Opinions==mine