[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lwip-devel] ARP Table limited to 127 (s8_t)?
From: |
Fabian Koch |
Subject: |
[lwip-devel] ARP Table limited to 127 (s8_t)? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Aug 2016 12:19:00 +0000 |
Hey all,
I was wondering if there is a reason for ARP_TABLE_SIZE to be limited to s8_t
instead of u8_t?
We would need an ARP_TABLE_SIZE of at least 192 and would have to modify the
stack for that. (LWIP 1.4.1)
I can see some tricks where the s8_t is used as a return value in some
functions and thus indicates an error when negative.
But is there any showstopper reason to not pump it up to an u8_t?
cheers,
Fabian
- [lwip-devel] ARP Table limited to 127 (s8_t)?,
Fabian Koch <=