[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization
From: |
Kieran Mansley |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:18:26 +0000 |
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 13:15 +0100, Goldschmidt Simon wrote:
> > Don't forget that the majority of ports are going to be
> > archived soon as there are no maintainers for them.
>
> So change it or leave it? Using an old port on a new version seems good
> to me, if it works, so that would tell me to leave it the way it is. On
> the other hand, I'm thinking about it the way Thomas does. If we don't
> need the callback, why stick to it? It's only leaving something away and
> not implementing something new, after all.
If we can't think of a good reason to keep it, then get rid of it while
cleaning up this bit of code.
Kieran
- [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Goldschmidt Simon, 2007/03/02
- Re: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Dmitry Potapov, 2007/03/03
- Re: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Kieran Mansley, 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Goldschmidt Simon, 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Kieran Mansley, 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Taranowski, Thomas \(SWCOE\), 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Kieran Mansley, 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization, Goldschmidt Simon, 2007/03/05
- RE: [lwip-users] small change in tcp/ip initialization,
Kieran Mansley <=