Re: [lwip-users] netconn_write throughput stuck at 1024 bytes

[address@hidden]

Kieran Mansley wrote:
> > In other
> > words, is there a difference in this:
> >
> > netconn_write(..., 4096, ...);
> >
> > or
> >
> > netconn_write(..., 1460, ...);
> > netconn_write(..., 1460, ...);
> > netconn_write(..., 284, ...);
> >     
>
> The correct answer is "maybe".


I'd say netconn_write(4096) is faster since it implies less threading 
overhead (between application thread an lwIP's tcpip_thread) than 
calling netconn_write 3 times. But you couldn't say how much this 
influences data throughput...

Simon