[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lwip-users] httpd slow response
From: |
Simon Goldschmidt |
Subject: |
RE: [lwip-users] httpd slow response |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:07:10 +0200 |
About performance measurement: I'd be happy to include such applications in the
contrib module - they do have to fulfill our needs though (an active
maintainer, mainly) - and they should have counterparts on some platforms (i.e.
unix/mac/windows) to be able to use them broadly.
Simon
> One thing I wonder - I see more posts asking about the performance of lwIP
> or wanting to increase lwIP performance. Many more than I see for posts
> wanting to run on a small processor with limited resources. Any chance
> you
> developers can reassess the goals that with times changing for embedded
> processor choices since lwIP was conceived that perhaps performance is
> gaining ground or surpassing the original goals of lwIP? There are now
> 32-bit processors in the same price range as 8-bit processors were 8 years
> ago. Yes, I admit that this question is self-serving, but I think I'm not
> in the minority for wanting the highest performance possible where code
> size
> and available RAM are not issues. I have made dozens of simple changes
> and
> increased my bandwidth over 10% over the base code. Some of it included
> also reducing code (i.e. the macro replacements I sent to you) and others
> were processor dependent (but also applicable to other processors).
>
> Can we/should we add a task for an lwIP test application that can be used
> on
> systems to test performance using some defacto standard program that can
> be
> run on Windows or Linux talking to the lwIP device? Conditional compile
> for
> Raw API and Sockets would be nice I think. I know cross-comparisons can't
> be
> made, but at least there will be information on what performance has been
> seen. When we go to "sockets 2", having this would give us a program to
> compare the 2 implementations.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lwip-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
--
Neu: GMX FreeDSL Komplettanschluss mit DSL 6.000 Flatrate + Telefonanschluss
für nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!*
http://dslspecial.gmx.de/freedsl-surfflat/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a
- Re: [lwip-users] httpd slow response, (continued)
- Re: [lwip-users] httpd slow response, Rick Culver, 2009/04/24
- RE: [lwip-users] httpd slow response, Bill Auerbach, 2009/04/24
- Re: [lwip-users] httpd slow response, Rick Culver, 2009/04/24
- Re: [lwip-users] httpd slow response, Kieran Mansley, 2009/04/24
- Re: [lwip-users] httpd slow response, Rick Culver, 2009/04/24
- Re: [lwip-users] httpd slow response, address@hidden, 2009/04/24
- RE: [lwip-users] httpd slow response, Bill Auerbach, 2009/04/24
- Re: [lwip-users] httpd slow response, address@hidden, 2009/04/25
- RE: [lwip-users] httpd slow response, Bill Auerbach, 2009/04/27
- RE: [lwip-users] httpd slow response, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/04/28
- RE: [lwip-users] httpd slow response,
Simon Goldschmidt <=
- Re: [lwip-users] httpd slow response, Simon Goldschmidt, 2009/04/24
Re: [lwip-users] httpd slow response, Rejean Groleau, 2009/04/24