[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Question about BASE implementation
From: |
Benjamin C. W. Sittler |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Question about BASE implementation |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Oct 1996 19:32:22 -0600 (MDT) |
Although the standards documents may disagree, here's how my ideal browser
would use BASE:
(Assume URL http://foo/bar/baz.html and BASE http://arf/index.html)
HREF Refers to
#chaptertwo http://foo/bar/baz.html#chaptertwo
index.html#mysec http://arf/index.html#mysec
?parm http://arf/index.html?parm
BAsically, fragment identifiers can be followed without reloading, but
using the name of the BASE's basename forces a change to the BASE doc.
Script parameters would always append to the BASE URL.
My $0.02
--
Benjamin C. W. Sittler - address@hidden - http://www.nmt.edu/~bsittler
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV Question about BASE implementation, Klaus Weide, 1996/10/21
- Re: LYNX-DEV Question about BASE implementation, Foteos Macrides, 1996/10/21
- Re: LYNX-DEV Question about BASE implementation, Foteos Macrides, 1996/10/21
- Re: LYNX-DEV Question about BASE implementation, Foteos Macrides, 1996/10/22
- Re: LYNX-DEV Question about BASE implementation, Foteos Macrides, 1996/10/22
- Re: LYNX-DEV Question about BASE implementation, Foteos Macrides, 1996/10/24
- Re: LYNX-DEV Question about BASE implementation, Foteos Macrides, 1996/10/24
- Re: LYNX-DEV Question about BASE implementation, NAME, 1996/10/30