Re: LYNX-DEV fotemods chartrans & SSL

[Klaus Weide]

On Thu, 23 Oct 1997, Foteos Macrides wrote:

> Klaus Weide <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >(gdb) set args -source -preparsed http://www.microsoft.com
> >(gdb) run
> > [ ... ]
> >Breakpoint 1, LYCheckForCSI (me=0x141900, url=0x141b9c) at 
> >./LYCharUtils.c:4467
> >4467        if (!me)
> >(gdb) p *me
> >$4 = {isa = 0xe689c, node_anchor = 0x1417a0, text = 0xd28d8,
> >  target = 0x687e4, targetClass = {name = 0x68e48 "\235c?\220!",
> >    _free = 0x68764 <HTFWriter_put_character>,
> >    _abort = 0x687ac <HTFWriter_put_string>,
> >    put_character = 0x687c4 <HTFWriter_write>,
> >    put_string = 0x3c2f5441 <MessageSecs+1008458489>,
> >    put_block = 0x424c453e <MessageSecs+1111018486>}, CurrentA = 0xd0a6172,
> >  CurrentANum = 2033150317,
> > [ ... ]
> >(gdb) p me->isa
> >$5 = (HTStructuredClass *) 0xe689c
> >(gdb) p *me->isa
> >$6 = {name = 0xe68c0 "HTMLGen", _free = 0x983e0 <HTMLGen_free>,
> >  _abort = 0x98448 <HTMLGen_abort>,
> >  put_character = 0x97cb8 <HTMLGen_put_character>,
> >  put_string = 0x97ffc <HTMLGen_put_string>, _write = 0x98034 
> > <HTMLGen_write>,
> >  start_element = 0x9806c <HTMLGen_start_element>,
> >  end_element = 0x982cc <HTMLGen_end_element>,
> >  put_entity = 0x98384 <HTMLGen_put_entity>}
> >(gdb)
> 
>       LYCheckForCSI() is not called when you use -source and have
> a target associated with the HTML generator.  It *will* be called when
> you have -preparsed without -source, it's appropriate to call it in
> that case, will have the appropriate target argument, and it will not
> crash.  

It seems you are just speculating and haven't actually tried it,
and you haven't understood what the debug output means.  Or you must
be talking about some other code set, not 2.7.1ac-0.84 (or following).

> There was no need to change what you had before in the devel
> code.

If by "before" you mean before -83 but after -63 or so - yes it did
"work", but it is you who wrote "but that would defeat the point of this
example."  I happen to agree.

> Could you at least restore that, instead of what you have now
> with your interdigitated, false comments?

They are not false.  Please try to understand what they are saying.
If you have a better formulation to offer which takes account
of how that function actually may be called, please contribute it.

      Klaus

;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE:  Send a mail message to address@hidden
;                  with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
;                  quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;