[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev build of lynx2.8.1dev.10 failed on Solaris 2.6
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev build of lynx2.8.1dev.10 failed on Solaris 2.6 |
Date: |
Wed, 13 May 1998 05:28:08 -0400 (EDT) |
>
> Will there also be problems with LYMain.c line 3269 which reads:
> "tagsoup", FUNCTION_ARG, tagsoup_fun,
> ? ^
>
no: there are several cases; the one you cites yesterday is the address
of a pointer, and in the macros is (type)cast to a 'long'. But the
ones on lines marked 'FUNCTION_ARG' are function-names, which are
implicitly addresses.
I checked the types (because John's original patch dumped core), by
constructing some debug-ifdef's which would flush out the mismatches.
But gcc silently supplied the missing '&' in that case (which is a
little surprising, since I thought it covered that case -- but occasionally
it misses something).
> __Henry
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- lynx-dev build of lynx2.8.1dev.10 failed on Solaris 2.6, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/05/12
- Re: lynx-dev build of lynx2.8.1dev.10 failed on Solaris 2.6, T.E.Dickey, 1998/05/12
- Re: lynx-dev build of lynx2.8.1dev.10 failed on Solaris 2.6, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/05/12
- Re: lynx-dev build of lynx2.8.1dev.10 failed on Solaris 2.6, T.E.Dickey, 1998/05/12
- Re: lynx-dev build of lynx2.8.1dev.10 failed on Solaris 2.6, Nelson Henry Eric, 1998/05/13
- Re: lynx-dev build of lynx2.8.1dev.10 failed on Solaris 2.6,
T.E.Dickey <=
- Re: lynx-dev build of lynx2.8.1dev.10 failed on Solaris 2.6, David Combs, 1998/05/13
- Re: lynx-dev build of lynx2.8.1dev.10 failed on Solaris 2.6, T.E.Dickey, 1998/05/14