[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Re: when, where, why "kb/sec"?
From: |
Bela Lubkin |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Re: when, where, why "kb/sec"? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Sep 1998 12:35:57 -0700 |
Leonid Pauzner wrote:
> I feel the only question here:
> is it good enouth to have both "KB" and "kb/s" in the same line...
> (they have common 1024 denominator, of cause).
The patch I submitted changes them both to "KB", which is the correct
abbreviation according to my conventions ("k" = 1000, "K" = 1024, when
talking about computer storage; and "b" = bits, "B" = bytes; thus the
unit being measured is "Kilobytes" or 1024-byte units). That is, if you
patch it to display K rather than bytes -- which, I remind you, I did
not provide any user interface to do.
>Bela<
- Re: lynx-dev Re: when, where, why "kb/sec"?, dickey, 1998/09/10
- Re: lynx-dev Re: when, where, why "kb/sec"?, dickey, 1998/09/10
- Re: lynx-dev Re: when, where, why "kb/sec"?, Leonid Pauzner, 1998/09/11
- Re: lynx-dev Re: when, where, why "kb/sec"?,
Bela Lubkin <=