Re: lynx-dev anonymous usage of Lynx (was Arizona)

[dickey]

> What about non-anonymous security? Places where Lynx (with restrictions)  
> is a shell for users (with their own seperate accounts). Is this something 
> that will continue to be developed in the future for Lynx, or should 
> freenet style systems start looking now for something else that meets 
> their needs? 

I don't have any inclination to discard useful/working features from Lynx
(the directory permissions problem we're working through is afaik a valid
criticism whether Lynx is run as an anonymous account or from a private
account.

> Ian 
>  
> ------------------------------------------- 
> Ian White 
> email: address@hidden 


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey