[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev results on lint on lynx 2.8.2dev9
From: |
dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev results on lint on lynx 2.8.2dev9 |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Dec 1998 18:18:56 -0500 (EST) |
>
> Here are the warnings from Solaris lint that I thought might want to be
thanks - I've looked briefly at lint on Solaris, but iirc, it usually
(lint) breaks.
> examined by people responsible for various modules. I know they are only
> warnings. In the case of the fallthrough messages, I only left in the
> warnings that had no comments around them indicating that the fallthrough
> was intentional. Perhaps someone should take a look to ensure that each
> of these are intentional fallthroughs. If you let me know, I would be
> happy to create patches of fallthrough comments in the appropriate places .
> In the case of non-unique names, this would only be a problem on an IBM MVS
> environment which required 8 character uniqueness.
There is some logic to support shortnames - though I have noticed numerous
places (and fixed) where the #define's go the wrong way.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey