Re: lynx-dev dev17 clue?

[posterkid]

[replying via web archive, sorry no In-Reply-To:]

>     * From: Philip Webb <address@hidden>
>     * Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 19:19:15 -0500 (EST)
>     _________________________________________________________________
>                                      
>i meant to comment that the stripped binary of 2-8-2dev.17 is  1,59 M
>a/a 2-8-1rel.1 , which is  1,45 M : might the problem have anything
>to do with the .po stuff, which i paid no attention to?  anyway, it's bigger.

I think I would like to create a configure option to disable all of
the extended cookie options that have recently been created, from 
COOKIE_ACCEPT_DOMAINS to this latest configuration of cookie validity
checking.  Before I sift through the #ifdef soup (I like that line),
does anyone have issues/arguments against more compiletime options?

Perhaps it should even default to be disabled -- I expect several
people are happy with the cookie behavior as it was before.  I have 
the nasty feeling we're adding bloat with some of this stuff.

-bjp

-- 
no sig