[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev fixed 123+p bug
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev fixed 123+p bug |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Feb 1999 19:02:12 -7700 (EST) |
990228 Laura Eaves wrote:
> (was this a typo or a thinko?... I'm afraid it was the latter...:)
> Anyway, here's the entire patch, sans the update to follow_help.html
> which I posted earlier and which hasn't changed).
> I did have to touch mainloop(),
> but the line I added was much more careful than the first time...
tested on the WP article, it now appears to work ok, except 1 nit:
when on page 13 (out of 14), 5+p takes you to page 14 ,
but on link [21] (out of 24), 5+g gives an error message;
one could argue both, but the message is probably slightly safer for users.
> I haven't changed the syntax. Taking votes:
> does anyone want it changed to 123p+ or 0+123p? (similar for g and -)
> Thanks for any feedback.
well, you didn't wait for my feedback ...
please let's have a recount or another vote.
don't forget to include your own: mine is for 123p+ ;
as donor of time & skill, you get to decide if it's an even split.
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
- Re: lynx-dev fixed 123+p bug,
Philip Webb <=