[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Re: The old lynx bug
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Re: The old lynx bug |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Apr 1999 10:54:19 -0500 (EST) |
990402 Martin Schultz outlined a "bug" in Lynx 2.4-FM-960316-1 ,
involving HTML 2.0 specs for definition lists:
others among the international team of volunteers who maintain Lynx
can offer more expert advice about HTML, but otherwise:
first in practice, only the latest release/development versions are supported:
you can get 2-8-1 from www.slcc.edu/lynx/release
& 2-8-2dev.21 from sol.slcc.edu/lynx/current ;
second, there is no mention of the requirement in HTML 4.0 (as you say),
nor is it clear what the rather brief account in the RFC for 2.0 means,
but it does seem at least better aesthetically
not to insert a blank line between consecutive <DT><DT>'s ;
third, the described behaviour does indeed persist with 2-8-2dev.19 .
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto