[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching
From: |
dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Apr 1999 17:53:54 -0400 (EDT) |
> On Sun, 11 Apr 1999, Leonid Pauzner wrote:
>
> > 11-Apr-99 12:46 Scott Bigham wrote:
>
> > > (examines code) Wait a minute. The declaration and definition of
> > > free_all_texts() are wrapped in '#ifdef LY_FIND_LEAKS', but the
> > > atexit(free_all_texts) call in HText_new() isn't. How can that even
> > > compile without LY_FIND_LEAKS #define'd? [...]
>
> > That was the very recent changes that #define atexit to nothing
> > to decrease shutdown time (and free_all_texts() is the main contributor),
>
> Eek! That's almost certainly a bad idea.
no - only on MSDOS is it a bad idea (good idea on Unix and VMS, since allocated
memory is returned on exit from a process). MSDOS doesn't have separate
address spaces (nor does DJGPP implement that, apparently ;-).
> -sbigham
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, Scott Bigham, 1999/04/11
- lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, take 2, Scott Bigham, 1999/04/11
- Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, take 2, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/04/12
- Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, take 2, Scott Bigham, 1999/04/12
- Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, take 2, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/04/12
- Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, take 2, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/04/12
- Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/04/11
- Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/04/11
- Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/04/11
lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching ("raw_mode" patch), Leonid Pauzner, 1999/04/12
Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching,
dickey <=
Re: lynx-dev PATCH [dev21]: source caching, dickey, 1999/04/11