Re: lynx documentation (was Re: lynx-dev HTML 4.0 (was Commenting... ))

[dickey]

> 
> On Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 10:18:13AM -0400, Philip Webb wrote: 
> > Michael Sobolev wrote:  
> > > Finally I found that the documentation is incomplete. :) 
> >  
> > a common occurrence ... 
> Sure.  :) 
>  
> > health warning: trying to improve Lynx documentation can be painful. 
> Yes, that should be. 
>  
> BTW, can anybody tell how the documentation of lynx is usually modified? 
> A lot of features get added, and then, one day, documentation is brought 
> up-to-date, or every added feature gets immediately documented? 

some people document as they go along, some don't.

All of the interesting changes should be reflected in 'CHANGES'.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey