[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary
From: |
mattack |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Oct 1999 23:13:40 -0700 (PDT) |
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Brett Glass wrote:
>Actually, no; there are no commercial products to compare it to, really,
>nor other freely redistributable ones worth mentioning. It's the only thing
>in its category that could possibly provide a foundation for what we're
>doing. Anything we can't get legally from Lynx we will have to write afresh
>or have "clean roomed" for us.
As I mentioned in my "I hope you release it (or sell it) for use by other
than blind people if it ends up better than Lynx" message, there is also
w3m:
http://ei5nazha.yz.yamagata-u.ac.jp/~aito/w3m/eng/
>From the history information, it looks like it was mostly written by one
person. I do not know if it falls under the GPL. You can get the
source and find out. (I searched around the web page but couldn't find the
answer.)
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Gene Collins, 1999/10/05
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Brett Glass, 1999/10/05
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Gene Collins, 1999/10/05
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Brett Glass, 1999/10/05
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Gene Collins, 1999/10/06
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary,
mattack <=
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Frederic L . W . Meunier, 1999/10/06
- Re: lynx-dev w3m license [was: Licensing Lynx: Summary], Dave Eaton, 1999/10/06
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Richard Stallman, 1999/10/08
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Brett Glass, 1999/10/07
- Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Richard Stallman, 1999/10/08
Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, T.E.Dickey, 1999/10/05
Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, Henry Nelson, 1999/10/06
Re: lynx-dev Licensing Lynx: Summary, T.E.Dickey, 1999/10/06