[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wget, & and lynx (was Re: lynx-dev bug report)
From: |
Klaus Weide |
Subject: |
Re: wget, & and lynx (was Re: lynx-dev bug report) |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Oct 1999 06:44:38 -0500 (CDT) |
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Leonid Pauzner wrote:
> 25-Oct-99 15:56 Klaus Weide wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Leonid Pauzner wrote:
> >> 25-Oct-99 11:20 Oliver Seidel wrote:
> >>
> >> > -rw-r--r-- 1 os10000 private 3689 Oct 25 11:10
> >> > forum_reply?keepcookie=0&lm=854576442
> >>
> >> > <TABLE>
> >> > <TR><TD><A HREF="../forum_reply?keepcookie=0&lm=854576442">How much
> >> > wood would a wood chuck ch...</A><TD>1 day old<TD>(last of 9 replies 998
> >> > days ago)</TR>
> >>
> >> 2) lynx is wrong since do translate entities for local file names
> >> appeared from directory listing (not one embeded into HTML).
>
> > Nothing in the example shown were lynx-generated.
>
> The example above shows that local file with & in filemane exists
> (3689 bytes) and lynx cannot open it from dired list OR from command line.
> Haven't tested it though, just trust the author.
How does it show that?
Oliver didn't say (or show) anything about either dired or command line.
Klaus
- lynx-dev bug report, Oliver Seidel, 1999/10/24
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/25
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, Oliver Seidel, 1999/10/25
- wget, & and lynx (was Re: lynx-dev bug report), Leonid Pauzner, 1999/10/25
- Re: wget, & and lynx (was Re: lynx-dev bug report), Klaus Weide, 1999/10/25
- Re: wget, & and lynx (was Re: lynx-dev bug report), Doug Kaufman, 1999/10/25
- Re: wget, & and lynx (was Re: lynx-dev bug report), Klaus Weide, 1999/10/26
- Re: wget, & and lynx (was Re: lynx-dev bug report), Leonid Pauzner, 1999/10/26
- Re: wget, & and lynx (was Re: lynx-dev bug report),
Klaus Weide <=
- Re: wget, & and lynx (was Re: lynx-dev bug report), Leonid Pauzner, 1999/10/26
- Re: wget, & and lynx (was Re: lynx-dev bug report), Ismael Cordeiro, 1999/10/26
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, Klaus Weide, 1999/10/25
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, David Woolley, 1999/10/26